Table of Contents
1
1.1 Groups
1.2 Properties of a Group
1.3 Permutation Groups
1.4 Subgroups
1.5 Cyclic Groups
1.6 Order of an Element
Chapter 1
1.1 Groups
Definition 1.1.1. A group is an ordered pair , where is a nonempty set and is a binary operation on such that the following properties hold:
- For all (associative law).
- There exists such that for all (existence of an identity).
- For all , there exists such that (existence of an inverse).
- , and are groups under usual addition.
- The set of all matrices where is a group under matrix addition. is the identity element and is the inverse of
- The set of non-singular matrices where is a group under matrix multiplication. is the identity element. The inverse of is where
- is not a group under usual addition since there is no element such that
- The set of all even integers under usual addition is a group.
- and under usual multiplication are groups. 1 is the identity element and the inverse of a non-zero element is
- is a group under usual multiplication. For . Therefore usual multiplication is a binary operation in is the identity element. If is the inverse of
- under the usual multiplication is not a group.
- Let be any non-empty set. Let be the set of all bijections from to itself. is a group under the composition of functions. We know that . The composition of functions is associative. is the identity element. If is a bijection, then is also a bijection and .
- Let and . Obviously is a group.
-
Let is a group under multiplication. 1 is the identity element. The inverse of each element is itself.
The Cayley table for this group is - is a group. is associative. Also for all . Hence is the identity element. so that inverse of each element is itself.
-
. is a group under usual multiplication. The identity element is 1. The inverse of 1, and are and respectively.
The Cayley table for this group is given by
- Let . is a group under matrix multiplication.
-
is a group under usual multiplication given by .
Proof : Let Then where and are not simultaneously zero and where and are simultaneously zero. Now,
We shall first prove that and are not simultaneously zero. Suppose,
Multiplying (1.1) by and (1.2) by and subtracting, we get
Therefore either or . Thus either or and .
Similarly, either or and . Thus and or and .
Thus or which is a contradiction.
Hence .
Now, let and . ThenSimilarly,
Hence .
Clearly is the identity element. AlsoSince and is the inverse of .
Hence is a group under usual multiplication. □ -
Let and . Then is a under usual multiplication.
Proof : Let . Then
and so .
We know that usual multiplication of complex numbers is associative.
Also and is the identity element.
Now, let . Then .
Hence and so and is the inverse of .
Hence is a group. □ -
The set of all roots of unity with usual multiplication is a group.
Proof : Let .
Then the roots of unity are given by 1, .
Let .
We know that etc.
Let .
Let where . ThenWe know that usual multiplication of complex number is associative.
Clearly is the identity element and the inverse of is . Hence is a group. □ -
Let . Then is a group under addition.
Proof : Let and . Then
We know that usual addition is associative.
Clearly is the identity element and is the inverse of . Hence is a group. □ -
Let be the set of all real numbers except . Defineon by Then is a group.
Proof : Let . Then and .
We claim that .
Suppose . Then so that ,
i.e., so that either or which is a contradiction.
Hence and thusis a binary operation on . NowAlso
Hence .
Also is the identity, for and .
Now, let be such that
Then so that .
Since , we have AlsoHence is the inverse of and so is a group. □
-
In we define . Then is a group.
Proof : Obviously is a binary operation in .
Let . ThenHence is associative.
Let be such that .
Therefore and hence .
Let . Let be such that .
Then be such that . Then , (i.e)
Thus i.e., is the inverse of . Thus is a group. □ -
Let be the function defined by . Then is a group under composition of functions.
Proof : Let . Then
Hence
We know that composition of mappings is associative.
Alsoand so is the identity. Also
Hence is the inverse of . Hence is a group. □
Definition 1.1.3. Let . Let . Then where . We define . Let where . We define . The binary operations and are called addition modulo and multiplication modulo respectively.
Show that is a group.
Proof : Clearly a binary operation in . Let . Then
and so
Hence
where .
Now
Also
Hence
is associative.
Clearly the identity element is
and the inverse of
is .
Hence
is a group. □
Proof : Let .
Then
and .
Now, by definition
We claim that .
Suppose .
Then .
Since is
prime,
or and
so or
which
is a contradiction.
Hence .
Now, let .
Clearly
Thus
Hence
Now,
Also,
Thus
and hence
is associative.
Clearly
is the identity element.
Let . Since
is prime
. Hence the linear
congruence ( mod
) has a unique
solution, say, .
Clearly .
Thus is the
inverse of .
Hence
is a group. □
Proof : Let
and .
Let .
Obviously
and .
Now let .
Then .
We claim that .
Suppose .
Then
and .
Hence
i.e., .
Also .
Hence
which is a contradiction.
Thus and so
is closed
under .
We know that multiplication modulo
is associative.
Clearly
is the identity element.
Let . Then
. Hence the linear
congruence ( mod
) has a unique
solution for
say .
Clearly
( mod )
and so .
Now we have to prove that .
Suppose .
Since (
mod ),
. Now
and
Thus and and is the inverse of . Thus is a group. □
Proof :
Let
.
Let
and
Then
.
We
know
that
matrix
multiplication
is
associative.
Let
be
such
that
.
Then
and
so
.
Therefore
and
.
Hence
is
the
identity
element
of
.
Let
be
the
inverse
of
.
Then
and
so
.
Thus
and
.
Inverse
of
is
.
Hence
is
a
group. □
Proof : Clearly is an associative binary operation on . However, there is no element such that for all . Hence there is no identity element in . Hence is not a group. □
Definition 1.1.4. A group is said to be abelian if for all . A group which is not abelian is called a non-abelian group.
- . and under usual multiplication are abelian groups.
- is an abelian group, since for all .
- is an abelian group.
1.2 Properties of a Group
Theorem 1.2.1. Let be a group. Then
- There exists a unique identity element such that for all
- For all , there exists a unique inverse such that
Proof :
-
Now is group. Therefore, by Definition of group, there exists such that
Suppose, let and be two identity elements of . Then (since is an identity element). Also ( since e is an identity element). Hence
-
Let . By Definition of group, there exists such that . Suppose there exists such that . We show that Now
Thus, is unique.
We denote the inverse of by
Proof : Suppose
Similarly, we can prove that □
Proof :
Consider
.
Then
.
Hence
is
a
solution
of
.
Now,
to
prove
the
uniqueness,
let
and
be
two
solutions
of
.
Then
and
.
Therefore
which
implies
.
Hence
is
the
unique
solution
for
.
Similarly
we
can
prove
that
is
the
solution
of
the
equation
□
Proof : Now
Similarly .
Hence .
Proof of the second part is obvious. □
Definition 1.2.6. Let be a group and . For any positive integer , we define ( written times). Clearly
Now we define
Finally we define . Thus is defined for all integers
Proof :
-
When the result follows directly from the definition.
Now let We prove the result by induction .
When (by definition).
When and .
Hence .
When , let , where
Hence , for all and so the result is true for . Suppose now that the theorem is valid for . Then
- Obvious.
Solved Problems
Solution.
Clearly
Conversely,
let
.
Then
.
Hence
by
cancellation
law
Note 1.2.10. An element is called idempotent if . Thus we have shown that in a group G. the identity element is the only idempotent element.
Solution. Clearly
Solution.
Since
Now,
ab
.
Hence
is
abelian.
Problem 1.2.14. Let be a group in which for three consecutive integers and for all . Then is abelian.
Solution. Let . Then by hypothesis,
Now,
Similarly
Hence is abelian.
Problem 1.2.15. Let and be groups. We define a binary operation on by
Then
is
a
group.
is
called
the
direct
product
of
and
).
Solution. First we shall prove that
is associative.
Let
Let be the identities
of the groups
and respectively.
Clearly is the
identity element in .
Also is the
inverse of .
Hence
is a group.
1.3 Permutation Groups
Example 1.3.2. If given by and is a permutation of . We shall write this permutation as
An element in the bottom row is the image of the element just above it in the upper row.
Definition 1.3.3. Let be a finite set containing elements. The set of all permutations of is clearly a group under the composition of functions. This group is called the symmetric group of degree and is denoted by
Example 1.3.4. Let . Then consists of
In this group,
is the identity element.
We now compute the product
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
2 | 3 | 1 | Hence | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 |
So that . Now,
Similarly we can compute all other products and Cayley table for this group is given by
Thus is a group containing elements.
-
In , so that the inverse of is . In general the inverse of a permutation can be obtained by interchanging the rows of the permutation.
- In and . Hence so that is non-abelian.
- The symmetric group containing elements, for, let . Any permutation on is given by specifying the image of each element. The image of 1 can be chosen in different ways. Since the image of two is different from the image of 1, it can be chosen in different ways and so on. Hence the number of permutations of is so that the number of elements in is
Definition 1.3.7. Let be a finite group. Then the number of elements in is called the order of and is denoted by or .
Definition 1.3.8. Let be a permutation on is called a cycle of length if there exist distinct symbols such that
and for all
This cycle is represented by the symbol .
Thus under the cycle each symbol is mapped onto the following symbol except the last one which is mapped onto the first symbol and all the other symbols not in the cycle are fixed.
Note 1.3.10. Since cycles are special types of permutations, they can be multiplied in the usual way. The product of cycles need not be a cycle.
Remark 1.3.14. If and are disjoint cycles the symbols which are moved by are fixed by and vice versa. Hence multiplication of disjoint cycles is commutative.
-
Consider the permutation
We shall write this permutation as a product of disjoint cycles. First of all 1 is moved to 2 and then 2 is moved to 1 thus giving the cycle . The element 3 is left fixed. Again starting with 4, 4 is moved to 5, 5 is moved to 6, 6 is moved to 7 and 7 is moved to 4, thus giving the cycle . Thus -
Consider the permutation
Starting with 1 we get the cycle . The elements 4,5 do not appear in it. Starting with 4 we get the cycle . Each element of the set 1, 2, occurs in one of the two cycles. Thus .
- Consider the permutation . Clearly .
Proof :
Let
be
a
given
permutation
of
the
set
.
Let
us
start
with
any
symbol
.
Let
.
Since
is
finite,
these
symbols
cannot
all
the
distinct
and
hence
there
exists
a
least
positive
integer
such
that
and
Let
.
If
then
so
that
is
cycle.
If
,
let
be
a
symbol
in
such
that
.
Starting
with
we
can
construct
the
cycles
as
before.
Clearly
the
cycles
and
are
disjoint.
If
then
.
If
then
we
repeat
this
process
to
obtain
more
cycles
until
all
symbols
appear
in
one
of
the
cycles.
Thus
we
get
a
decomposition
of
into
disjoint
cycles. □
Note 1.3.17. The decomposition of a permutation into disjoint cycles is unique except for the order of the factors.
Definition 1.3.18. A cycle of length two is called a transposition Thus a transposition interchanges the symbols and and leaves all the other elements fixed.
Proof : Since any permutation is a product of disjoint cycles it is enough to prove that each cycle is a product of transpositions. Let be a cycle. Then
This proves the theorem. □
- Let . Then and so the representation of a permutation as a product of transpositions is unique.
- Clearly . Thus in the representation of a permutation as a product of transpositions one can always insert in any place since is the identity permutation.
Theorem 1.3.21. If a permutation is a product of transpositions and also a product of transpositions then either and are both even or both odd.
Proof : Let where are transpositions. Now consider the polynomial in variables given by
For any permutation we define
Consider the transposition . Then the factor in becomes Any factor of in which neither nor is equal to or is unchanged. All other factors of can be paired to form products of the form , the sign being determined by the relative magnitudes of and . Since interchanges and any such product is unchanged. Hence the effect of the transposition on is just to change the sign of i.e, . Therefore
Also
Therefore and are both even or both odd. □
Definition 1.3.22. A permutation is called even or odd according as can be expressed as a product of an even number of transpositions or an odd number of transpositions respectively.
-
Consider the permutation
Therefore is a product of 4 transposition. Hence is an even permutation.
-
Consider the permutation
Therefore is a product of 5 transposition and so is an odd permutation.
- The product of two even permutations is an even permutation.
- The product of two odd permutations is an even permutation.
- The product of an even permutation and an odd permutation is an odd permutation.
- The inverse of an even permutation is an even permutation.
- The inverse of an odd permutation is an odd permutation.
- The identity permutation is an even permutation.
Proof : Let be two permutations. If is a product of transpositions and is a product of transposition, then is a product of transpositions. Hence (1), (2) and (3) follows.
Now suppose that a permutation is a product of transpositions, say, . Then
and so is also a product of transpositions. This proves (4) and (5).
Now, and hence is an even permutation which proves (6). □
Theorem 1.3.25. Let be the set of all even permutations in . Then is a group containing permutations.
Proof :
From
(1),(6)
and
(4)
of
Theorem
1.3.24,
we
see
that
is
a
group.
Now
let
be
the
set
of
all
permutations
in
.
Define
:
by
Suppose
.
Hence
is
1-1.
If
,
then
and
.
Hence
is
onto.
Thus
is
a
bijection
and
hence
the
number
of
odd
permutations
in
=
the
number
of
even
permutations
in
Since
contains
permutations,
has
elements. □
Definition 1.3.26. The group of all even permutations in is called the alternating group on symbols.
1.4 Subgroups
Definition 1.4.1. Let be a set with binary operation defined on it. Let If for each is in , we say that is closed with respect to the binary operation
- is a group. The set of all even integers is closed under and further is itself a group.
- The set of of all non-singular matrices form a group under matrix multiplication. Let be the set of all matrices of the form . Then is subset of and itself a group under matrix multiplication.
Definition 1.4.3. A subset of group is called subgroup of if forms a group with respect to the binary operation in
- Let be any group. Then and are trivial subgroups of . They are called improper subgroups of
- is a subgroup of and is a subgroup of .
-
In , let and . The Cayley tables for and are given by
It is easily seen that and are closed under and are groups. Hence and are subgroups of
- is a subgroup of .
- is a subgroup of .
- For any integer we define . Then is a subgroup of .
For, let . Then and where .
Hence and so is closed under .
Clearly is the identity element.
Inverse of is . Hence is a group.In the symmetric group ,
are subgroups.
- is a subgroup of
- The set of permutations , where ; ; ; , is a subgroup of
Note 1.4.5. In all the above examples we see that the identity element in the subgroup is the same as the identity element of the group.
Theorem 1.4.6. Let be a subgroup of . Then
- the identity element of is the same as that of
- for each the inverse of in is the same as the inverse of in
Proof :
- Let and be the inverse of in and respectively. Since by (1), and have the same identity element , we have . Hence by cancellation law, .
Proof : Let be subgroup of . The result follows immediately from Theorem 1.4.6.
Conversely, let be a subset of satisfying conditions (1), (2) and (3). Then, obviously itself a group with respect to the binary operation in . Therefore is a subgroup of □
Proof : Let be a subgroup of . Then
Conversely, suppose is a non-empty subset of such that
Since , there exists . Hence .
Therefore, , i.e., contains the identity element .
Also, since . Hence .
Now, let . Then . Hence and so is closed under the binary operation in . Hence by Theorem 1.4.7, is a subgroup of □Theorem 1.4.10. Let be a non-empty finite subset subset of . If is closed under the operation in then is a subgroup of
Proof : Let . Then are all elements of . But since is finite the elements , cannot all be distinct. Hence let . Then . Now, let . We have proved that for some . Hence . Hence . Thus is a subgroup of □
Note 1.4.11. Theorem 1.4.10 is not true if is infinite.
For example, is an infinite subset of and is closed under addition. However is not a subgroup of .Proof : Clearly and so is non-empty.
Now let . Then and . Since and are subgroups of and Therefore . Hence by Theorem 1.4.10, is a subgroup of □It can be similarly proved that the intersection of any number of subgroups of is again a subgroup of
Remark 1.4.13. The union of two subgroups of a group need not be a subgroup.
For example, and are subgroups of but is not a subgroup of since butTheorem 1.4.14. The union of two subgroups of a group is a subgroup if and only if one is contained in the other.
Proof : Let and be two subgroups of such that one is contained in the other. Then either or .
Therefore or . Hence is a subgroup of
Conversely, suppose is not contained in and is not contained in . Then there exist elements such that , and
Clearly . Since is a subgroup of . Hence or .
If , then since .
Hence , a contradiction.
If since . Hence , a contradiction.
Hence our assumption that is not contained in and is not contained in is false.
Therefore or □Note 1.4.16. If and are two subgroups of , then need not be a subgroup of
For example, consider and . Then and are subgroups of . AlsoNow, Hence is not a subgroup of
Proof : Suppose is a subgroup of .
Let , where and
Now and . Because is a subgroup, it follows that . Hence,(1.9) On the other hand, let . Then so for some and . Thus, This implies that
(1.10) From (1.9) and (1.10), we get, .
Conversely, suppose . Let , where and .
We show that .
Now and . Therefore, .
This implies that for some and
Similarly, , so for some and . Thus,Hence, is a subgroup of . □
Proof : Let Then where and .
Since is abelian, and so . Hence .
Similarly and . Hence is a subgroup of □Solved Problems
Solution. Clearly is non-empty. Now, let . Then and where . Thus
and so is a subgroup of
Problem 1.4.20. Let denote the set of all permutations in fixing the symbol l. Then is a subgroup of
Solution. Clearly and so is non-empty. Let . Then and fix the symbol 1. Now fixes the symbol fixes the symbol 1. Hence fixes symbol 1. Hence . Thus is a subgroup of
Problem 1.4.21. Let be the set of all matrices with entries from . Then is a group under matrix addition. Let . Then is a subgroup of
Solution. Let . Then and . Now
Hence is a subgroup of
Problem 1.4.22. Let be a group. Let and for all
(ie) is the set of all elements which commute with every other element. Show that is a subgroup ofSolution. Clearly for all .
Hence , so that is non-empty.
Now, let .
Then and for all . Now,Now
Thus commutes with every element of and so .
Hence is a subgroup ofSolution. Clearly . Hence so that is non-empty. Then and . Now,
Hence
Hence commutes with and so is a subgroup of
1.5 Cyclic Groups
Definition 1.5.1. Let be a group. Let . Then is a subgroup of is called the cyclic subgroup of generated by and is denoted by
Definition 1.5.3. Let be a group and let is called a generator of if
A group is cyclic if there exists an element such that
Note 1.5.4. If is cyclic group generated by an element , then every element of is of the form for some
- is a cyclic group and is the generator of this group. Clearly is also a generator of this group. Thus a cyclic group can have more than one generator.
- is a cyclic group and and are generators of this group.
- is a cyclic group and 1, 3, 5, 7 are all generators of this group.
- is a cyclic group for all is a generator of this group. In fact if and then is a generator of this group.
- is a cyclic group under usual multiplication; is a generator, is also a generator of . However is not a generator of since
- where is a cube root of unity is a cyclic group, and are both generators of this group.
- In this group , and are both generators. Here 2 is not a generator of since
- Let be a set containing more than one element. Then is not cyclic; for let be any element. Then so that .
- is not a cyclic group since for any
Proof : Let be a cyclic group.
Let . Then and for some . HenceHence is abelian. □
Proof : Let be a cyclic group generated by and let be a subgroup of .
We claim that is cyclic.
Clearly every element of is of the form for some integer .
Let be the smallest positive integer such that .
We claim that is the generator of .
Let . Then for some . ThenTherefore .
Now, . Since is a subgroup, . Also, .
Clearly and .
But is the least positive integer such that . Therefore .
Hence Every element of is a power of .
Thus and so is cyclic. □1.6 Order of an Element
Definition 1.6.1. Let be a group and let . The least positive integer if it exists) such that is called the order of . If there is no positive integer such that , then the order of is said to be infinite.
-
Consider the group ,
In this case, 3 is the least positive integer such that . Thus is of order 3.
- Consider , From this
sequence of elements 2, .
In this case there is no positive integer such that and contains infinite numbers of elements.
Thus the order 2 is infinite.
Theorem 1.6.3. Let be a group and . Then the order of is the same as the order of the cyclic group generated by
Proof : Let be an element of order . Then .
We claim that are all distinct.
Suppose where .
Then and which contradicts the definition of the order of .
Hence are distinct elements and which is of order
If is of infinite order, the sequence of elements are all distinct and are in . Hence is an infinite group. □Proof : Let . If is of infinite order, then is an infinite subgroup of , which is a contradiction since is finite. Hence the order of is finite. □
Remark 1.6.5. The converse of the above theorem is not true.
i.e., if is of group in which every element is of finite order then the group need not be finite. For example, if is of infinite set, then is an infinite group. In this group for every so that the order of every element other than is 2.Proof : Suppose . Then where and
Conversely, let .
Let where . NowThus and . Now, since is the least positive integer such that , we have . Hence and so □
Proof :
-
Let be an element of order . Then and
Now, if possible let and .
Therefore and which contradicts the definition of the order of .
Thus is the least positive integer such that . Hence the order of is -
We shall first prove that for any positive integer . Now and is trivially true if . Now, suppose that it is true for so that Then
Hence it is true for all positive integers.
Now, let be an element of order . Then . and soNow, if possible, let and .
Then and which contradicts the definition of the order of .
Thus is the least positive integer such that .
Therefore the order of is - The order of = the order of = the order of by (1).
Theorem 1.6.8. Let be a group and let be an element of order in . Then the order of , where , is where is the g.c.d of and
Proof : Let and so that and are relatively prime. Now,
Further if is any positive integer such that then .
Since order of is , we have . Therefore and so .
But and are relatively prime.
Hence so that .
Thus is the least positive integer such that .
Hence the order of □Corollary 1.6.10. Let be a finite cyclic group of order generated by an element . Then generates a cyclic group of order where is the g.c.d of and
Corollary 1.6.11. Let be a finite cyclic group of order generated by an element is a generator of if and only if and are relatively prime. Hence the number of generators of a cyclic group of order is where is the number of positive integers less than and relatively prime to
For example, consider the group . . Hence the group has exactly 4 generators and they are 1, 5, 7 and 11.Solved Problems
Problem 1.6.12. If is a finite group with even number of elements then contains at least one element of order 2.
Solution. Clearly is an element of order
Hence it is enough if we prove that there exists an element different from in whose inverse is itself.
Let . Then and .
Hence contains an even number of elements.
Also . Hence contains an odd number of elements.
Since the order of the group is even, there exists at least one element such thatSolution. Let where the ’s are mutually disjoint cycles of lengths .
Now, let . Since product of disjoint cycles is commutative,Now, since the elements moved by one cycle are left fixed by all the other cycles,
Now, since the order of .
Similarly divide .
Thus is a common multiple of
Thus the order of is the least such which is obviously the l.c.m ofProblem 1.6.14. If is a generator of the cyclic group and if there exist two unequal integers and such that , prove that is a finite group.
Solution. Since and are unequal we may assume that . Hence is a positive integer. Also
Therefore the order of is finite and so is a finite group.
0 Comments